


Who Will Speak For The Poor?
jesse jackson should have been in the news --
for very different reasons.
Monday, July 21, 2008
By Brian Gilmore
As the fallout over the Rev. Jesse Jackson’s off
the record remarks about Barack Obama continue to sprout wings in
the media, it has become clear that Jackson’s mistake was not only
the words and phrases he used, but the fact that he missed a
chance to again become a real player in a real debate in Black
America. That debate is this: Who speaks or who will speak for the
black poor and working poor that Bill Cosby, Barack Obama, and
many others now believe are fair targets for uncensored
condemnation? It is a still unanswered political question.
Jackson, who could have grabbed the leadership torch and made the
issue of black poverty real again in America, is now effectively
muted. His street corner words referring to Obama are what are
remembered now, and the issue of the black poor, and the black
working poor and the daunting issues they face, is lost in the
endless news cycle.
Yet, does that mean the issue of black poverty and the problems of
the black working poor are not real issues whose only solution is
for some prominent black politician or entertainer to give some
version of Booker T. Washington’s drop your buckets’ speech?
Back in October 1995 it was clear who spoke for the black poor and
black working poor: the Nation of Islam’s Minister Louis
Farrakhan. Minister Farrakhan had slowly risen through the
leadership ranks of Black America and despite his repeated
Anti-Jewish moments, and his links to the demise of Malcolm X, he
seized the moment.
In 2001, writer Ta’Nehisi Coates explained the reach of Farrakhan
and the power he emitted through the organization he headed, The
Nation of Islam:
"The sect's willingness to work with the black poor has given
Farrakhan legitimacy among people that the NAACP has seemingly
forgotten. In return, they have imbued him with a power few other
black leaders could wield: the power to strike fear in the hearts
of white people."
Coates added that Farrakhan championed those with “nothing to
lose” and that he represented “the unspoken threat of an ignored
poor black America...”
Now, don’t misunderstand; Louis Farrakhan has and has had little
patience for the personal failings of black people. The Million
Man March, as most of us recall, was about personal
responsibility. But regardless, Louis Farrakhan had the attention
of Black America and especially so had the attention of those who
were on the lower end of the economic ladder. More importantly, he
might have held Black America’s feet to the fire for not doing
better, but he did not hesitate to hold America’s feet to the fire
every time he rose to speak.
This is why Jackson’s odd moment on Fox News is such a missed
opportunity despite the backwardness of his comments. The issues
that the black poor and working poor face now are different from
the issues faced by middle class and upper middle class black
people. While the middle class might be concerned with the
survival of affirmative action programs in education and in
employment, civil rights enforcement, and other suspect remedial
efforts left over from the civil rights era, the black poor and
working poor have more desperate concerns.
Their wages are low and stagnant. They have trouble obtaining
health care and other job benefits. They are competing with new
immigrants for many of these menial jobs, they increasingly are
finding it difficult to obtain affordable housing, and the schools
their children attend are lousy and have been under-funded for
generations now.
Bill Cosby’s famous statement “the lower economic people are not
holding up their end in this deal” is a joke to many of them
because the black poor and working poor never got a deal; they
were left to die with few resources in aging neighborhoods,
depleted tax revenues, and corrupt self serving politicians (many
of them African-Americans) who had little, if any, power or will
to address any of their real issues.
So who will speak for the black poor and working poor now as the
presidential campaign rolls along to an end? Now that Cosby, Obama
and the pundits have effectively framed the discussion in such a
one sided manner, who will stand and deliver a speech not about
race but the other speech Black America and the country needs so
badly: the one about economic class.
Brian Gilmore is a public interest lawyer and Washington D.C.
based writer. He covers law and books for EbonyJet.com
Responses to "Who Will Speak For The Poor?"
07.21.08 at 1:45 PM
Elaine Brown says:
Brian Gilmore has spoken for the black poor, for black people
languishing in this relentlessly racist and oppressive scheme,
with the highest poverty and unemployment and incarceration and
cancer death rates, and the lowest wealth and business revenue
rates, reminding us that too many of us are willing to betray
our own people for a pitiable piece of personal comfort in
Massah's House.
Elaine Brown, author of "A Taste of Power" and "The Condemnation
of Little B"